art

Marina Abramovic's Idea of a Dinner Party

Last night, Marina Abramovic transformed the already typically transformative MOCA annual gala, testing her audience with a strange play on objectification and the human body that put many of those in attendance visibly on edge.

Marina required every guest — no matter the Chanel gown or tuxedo tailored just for the occasion — to don a white lab coat before entering the tent where dinner was to be served. Inside, they were confronted by tables that were adorned by either A) a naked man or women lying prone on a sort of high-tech, constantly spinning lazy susan while being smothered underneath a skeleton, or B) a rectangular table festooned with two human heads that poked up and out from the tabletops, expressionless but still blinking, gazing blankly out on the crowd. (Will Ferrell's reaction when he came face-to-face with one of his unexpected dinner companions was pretty priceless.) For dessert? An anatomically correct cake in the form and size of a human body.

The surgical undertones and references to the Other were clear in Abramovic's confrontational but playful "experiment," but beyond the plainly visible portion of the art, what was more interesting to me is the influence of the work that cannot be completely seen. While I didn't stay for the completion of Marina's performance piece, since I hadn't shelled out for a seat at the dinner, I didn't witness the full unfolding of this strange trial of viewer vs. viewed.

Clearly, there were the obvious themes of examination and objectification suggested by the lab coats, disembodied heads, and bodies on display. However, I would have loved to see how the presence of two unknown observers at each table impacted the behavior and conversation of the guests. It's also impossible to believe that Marina wasn't also poking at least a bit of fun at the gala's well-heeled guests, many of whom found themselves having paid $2,500 for the privilege of eating dinner alongside a faceful of unkempt genitals. (Nope. No Brazilian waxes here, folks.) But there was a darker element to the effort. After all, Marina pointed out in a recent LA Times article, "we are creating a vulnerable position with respect to the performers. You could do anything — you could take the fork and stab it in their heads." Luckily last night's event included no random acts of violence, that I know of, but the possibility created a certain tension that permeated the evening. Who really had the upper hand in the situation, though? The guests, who could have easily manhandled their disembodied dinner guests? Or the performers, whose silent observation completely shifted the behavior and experience of the ticketholders?

Dita von Teese perhaps said it best with a Tweet from inside the festivities, writing: "A favorite quote of mine: 'this must be art, because it sure ain't entertainment'. -Pogo"

Giles Pre-Fall

images via Style.com

I'm really enchanted with Giles Deacon's pre-fall presentation. Held in a Florence porcelain factory and accented by a metal soundtrack, the whole thing was a fantastically complicated equation. Kind of like:

Julian Schnabel plate paintings x a "Hoarders" episode + raver wigs

Though he is rehashing some spring trends here (electric tangerine, trench-style tops, nude dresses) I think he more than earns a pass for finding a way to inject them with some of his apocalyptic gloom-and-doom and British quirk.

Deacon once described his dresses as "a bit 'We're on, we're out, we mean business.'" And, underneath the industrial Stephen Jones headpieces, excess hair, and chaos, the pieces themselves are classic Deacon. Tough, straightforward and darkly sexy.

cindy sherman's tools

images via Style.com

le smoking

image via The Icon

I hope she didn't use an alcohol-based hairspray.

An exhibition of Hugh Kretschmer's photography--which I find really striking and hilarious--is opening tomorrow night at the Clark|Oshin Gallery on Wilshire.

There's something equally amusing and off-putting about his work that makes me think of filmmakers like Michel Gondry and Jean-Pierre Jeunet. I've never liked Dali's brand of surrealism--too serious--which is why I think I gravitate to Kretschmer's childlike-yet-macabre imagination.

In short, go look.

conspicious consumption

images via Massamo Gammacurta

These delicate lollipops--in their pretty, crystalline hues, with their tiny, imperfect bubbles--are beautiful strictly on a surface level.

But I also love the cheeky comment artist Massamo Gammacurta made by casting them in the shape of designer labels' logos. Sugar is the medium--a product with no real nutritional value that is usually eaten quickly and greedily. Contrast that to the argument for luxury goods: that they're highly valuable, special treasures that should last a lifetime and, because of that, are worth their exorbitant price tags.

Let's be real. Don't designer duds feel more akin to a guilty sugar rush than a wise investment these days?